Utah Moms for Clean Air

We are

Using the power of moms to clean up Utah's dirty air

Categories

Archives

Links

Tell Your Local Governments You Support Mass Transit!

October 31st, 2007

We need to let Salt Lake County officials know we support mass transit! There will be a re-vote on funding for TRAX and commuter rail on Thursday, November 1.

Last year, Salt Lake County voters approved a sizeable bond with the understanding that it would primarily fund mass transit. In accordance with voters’ wishes, the Salt Lake County Council of Governments (COG), voted to prioritize the Mid-Jordan and West Valley City TRAX lines, FrontRunner commuter rail, as well as an I-80 project. Utah County voters, also facing serious traffic and air pollution problems, have agreed to fund commuter rail from Utah County to Salt Lake City.

It is no secret that some Utah legislators object to funding mass transit and believe that all transportation money should be dedicated to roads. Last week, a legislative audit found that due to a mathematical error, the priority rankings of TRAX, FrontRunner Commuter Rail and road projects should be readjusted.

As a result of the audit, the Salt Lake County Council of Governments will re-vote the allocation of money to TRAX and commuter rail. See the summary of the situation in a Salt Lake Tribune editorial on October 19.

It is essential that we voice our support mass transit as a means of reducing air pollution along the Wasatch Front! Please forward this message to family and friends.

Thank you for all you do to support clean air!

Write or e-mail your comments to Salt Lake Mayor Peter Corroon, and Barbara Thomas, the Salt Lake County COG Coordinator:

Salt Lake County Mayor Peter Corroon
2001 South State Street, #N2100
Salt Lake City, UT 84190-1020
mayor@slco.org

Barbara Thomas, Intergovernmental Coordinator
Salt Lake County Council of Governments
295 N. Jimmy Doolittle Road
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
bthomas@wfrc.org

(more…)

Bad Air Making Headlines

October 30th, 2007

The lead editorial in today’s Salt Lake Tribune urges Utahns to make changes in their driving habits or face the dire health consequences of dirty air. In its op-ed “Inversion Season: Drive Less or Die,” available here, the Tribune states “Usually the inversions begin in December. But lately about the only thing predictable about Utah weather is that it’s unpredictable. Normal isn’t normal anymore. What is completely predictable is that if Utahns don’t change their polluting ways, this situation will continue to get worse. The reason is explosive population growth and an even steeper spike in the miles Utahns drive in their cars, trucks and SUVs.” It urges reductions in driving an increased use of transit by everyone: “We’ve got to do it every day, not just on ‘Air Action Days.’ Because if we don’t make a habit of cutting down our polluting ways, we won’t do it during an inversion. And if we don’t, eventually we’ll all suffer from lung diseases.”

We, obviously, couldn’t agree more.

The Salt Lake Tribune also reported on the continued bad air quality here in its article titled “Dreaded dirty-air season arrives early, prompts SL Valley health warnings”.

Air Pollution Hotline

October 29th, 2007

The Utah Division of Air Quality has issued a YELLOW air quality alert for Salt Lake and Davis Counties today.

If you are interested in air quality during the day, conditions are updated twice daily for the public. Get this information by calling the following hotline or checking air monitoring online.

Air Pollution Hotline
1. Residents in Salt Lake and Davis counties may call (801) 975-4009.
2. Residents in Utah and Weber counties may call (800) 228-5434.
3. Residents in Cache County may call (435) 792-6612.

Keep in mind that that data is not necessarily current for this moment. You can get hourly reports for particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and ozone, but these reports are often posted many hours later.

Check the national Air Now site for a quick view of the daily air pollution forecast.

Early Inversion - Yellow Burn Day

October 28th, 2007

The winter inversions have arrived early this year. The Utah Department of Environmental Quality has issued the following Air Quality Alert for today, Sunday, October 28th.

The Utah Department of Environmental Quality has called a ‘Choose Clean Air’ day for Davis and Salt Lake Counties for Sunday, October 28, 2007. The Bear River District Health Department has called a GREEN day for Cache County.

Air Quality Conditions and health statements are as follows:

CACHE County: Wood burn condition as issued by the Bear River Health Dept.: GREEN
Health advisory: none

SALT LAKE & DAVIS counties: Wood burn condition: YELLOW
Health advisory: none

UTAH County: Wood burn condition: GREEN
Health advisory: none

WEBER County: Wood burn condition: GREEN
Health advisory: none

To receive email alerts from the Department of Air Quality, sign up for the Choose Clean Air Listserv.

Yes, it is an Inversion. A Month Earlier than Normal!

October 28th, 2007

The mucky grey skies hanging over us are not a result of the wildfires in California — it is a home-grown inversion, a month earlier then the Wasatch Front usually sees them.

The Salt Lake Tribune reports that “Meteorologists say northern Utah is in the grip of the area’s first inversion of the season. Several days of virtually stagnant air has allowed local pollution to progressively build throughout the Salt Lake Valley. ‘There’s probably a little bit of smoke in there, but mostly up here it’s simply inverted air,’ said National Weather Service meteorologist Randy Graham. ‘The haze is really most noticeable along the Wasatch Front because of the pollutants.’”

The inversion is expected to break up Monday or Tuesday. In the meantime, this is an early reminder of how important it is to reduce our emissions during inversions (and every day). Try to reduce or avoid driving today, and take other steps outlines on our site here.

Read more about the inversion in the Salt Lake Tribune here

Clean School Bus USA

October 24th, 2007

Utah Moms for Clean Air has been asked to participate in the Clean School Bus USA campaign sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency. The Clean School Bus USA Program provides us with a great opportunity to make difference in our air quality by reducing the amount of air pollution created by school buses. By adopting better idling practices, retrofitting buses with modern emission control technology, using cleaner fuels, and replacing older school buses, Clean School Bus USA hopes to put tomorrow’s cleaner buses on the road today.

Diesel engines are one of the largest sources of fine particulate matter and also produce ozone-forming nitrogen oxides and toxic air pollutants. When inhaled, pollutants in diesel exhaust cause lung damage and aggravate existing conditions like asthma and environmental allergies. Diesel exhaust is also thought to be a likely human carcinogen. Children are more sensitive to the harmful effects of diesel exhaust because they breathe 50 percent more air per pound of body weight than do adults. Even more concerning are the health risks posed to our children riding on diesel school buses – they are exposed to up to ten times more toxic air pollutants than levels found in ambient air. There are approximately 450,000 school buses on the road nationwide and 390,000 of those buses are diesel. With more than 24 million children in the United States riding a bus to and from school everyday, there is an enormous burden of disease posed by the existing school bus fleet.

Tighter standards for new buses have already taken effect, however these standards don’t apply to existing buses. School buses can be in operation for 20 to 30 years, and without special action, it will take many years before new buses meeting the new pollution limits dominate our school bus fleet. The good news is that today’s buses can take advantage of cleaner technologies and fuels. Oxidation catalysts and particulate matter filters are two retrofit technologies that can help reduce diesel particulate matter. Both devices are housed in the exhaust system where they break down the pollutants in the exhaust. Oxidation catalysts are widely available and commonly used retrofit technologies. They are relatively simple, low cost devices that can be installed in almost all buses and require very little maintenance. They typically cost between $1,000 and $2,000 and reduce particulate matter emissions by 20 to 30 percent. Reductions may be even higher if used together with ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel. Particulate matter filters provide even greater particulate matter reductions. Filters are a more complex technology than catalysts and generally are most appropriate for 1995 and newer buses. Filters typically cost between $5,000 and $10,000 and require the use of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel. The combination of ultra-low sulfur diesel and particulate matter filter technology reduces particulate matter emissions by 60 to 90 percent. By understanding the current school bus fleet in Utah, we will be able to apply the most appropriate technology to help clean up our air and protect our children’s health.

About one third of all diesel buses now in service were built before 1990. These buses are excellent candidates for replacement as they pollute as much as six times more than new buses. Utah is fortunate enough to have an excellent role model in the Jordan School District, who under the guidance of transportation director, James Hinckle, has improved their school bus fleet to include 10 percent compressed natural gas vehicles. Much of the work done in this district was with the assistance of grants obtained from Clean School Bus USA.

Since its inception in 2003, Clean School Bus USA has awarded $5 to 7 million annually to help local school districts upgrade their bus fleets. Clean School Bus USA is a public-private environmental partnership and as such matching funds must be provided by grant recipients, with a typical rate of 5%. If our grant application is successful, we can expect an award of up to $500,000, which means we will need to provide matching funds of up to $25,000. This will likely be provided, in part, by participating school districts, but Utah Moms for Clean Air would like to see this grant money stretched even further by providing a greater percentage of matching funds. Please join us in protecting our children’s health by cleaning up Utah’s school bus fleet!

Please donate today.

Read more:

Press Clippings - Oct. 1, 2007 - Oct. 19, 2007

October 19th, 2007

‘Progress and Pitfalls: An Energy Update’, by Tim Wagner, Director, Utah Smart Energy Campaign; Utah Sierran, Fall 2007, page 1 & 8:

‘Utah Has Concerns’ - Op-Ed, Ely Times, Nevada, October 10, 2007.

‘Freeway called a health hazard’, Mountain View Corridor would increase cancer risks for children, say critics. By Patty Henetz, The Salt Lake Tribune, 10/17/2007.

‘Corridor meets opposition.’ Some say freeway is too near schools, By Patty Henetz , The Salt Lake Tribune, 10/18/2007.

Utah Has Concerns about Nevada Coal

October 16th, 2007

Cherise Udell, President of Utah Moms for Clean Air, and Dr. Brian Moench, President of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, recently wrote a letter to the Editor of the Ely News in eastern Nevada about proposed Nevada coal plants.

The Ely News published this letter last week. Look for the title, “Utah has concerns.”

Utah has concerns

To the Editor:

As clean air advocacy groups for Utah citizens, the Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment and the Utah Moms for Clean Air would like to respond to the editorial that appeared in this paper on Sept. 21 in support of the proposed Nevada coal plants.

Acknowledgement of the down side to these plants was limited to, “We don’t believe the plants will foul the air in Steptoe Valley . Nor do we believe Great Basin National Park or Utah have anything to fear from the two plants. And nor do we believe Reid’s proposal will do anything to cut overall carbon dioxide emissions.”

Decisions regarding building more coal plants should be based on science and facts and not just “beliefs.” We offer some science and facts that should be considered before Ely residents endorse these coal power projects.

(more…)

Next Page »

 


Become a Member and Receive Email Alerts

 

Recent Posts

Meta