Utah Moms for Clean Air

We are

Using the power of moms to clean up Utah's dirty air

Categories

Archives

Links

Air quality concerns over natural gas drilling

May 29th, 2008

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is in the news in Utah quite a bit in the past few days.

Last week, according to a Salt Lake Tribune story yesterday, the EPA decided the environmental study was inadequate for the Nine Mile Canyon natural gas drilling project. Today, in a longer story, the Salt Lake Tribune is reporting that the project should stop until the study is rewritten to include more information on air quality because the draft study “didn’t satisfy requirements of the Clean Air Act.”

Read the stories:

New EPA Ozone rules too lenient

May 29th, 2008

A group of advocacy organizations, including the American Lung Association, are suing the Environmental Protection Agency because they find the new EPA standards on ozone are not strong enough to protect public health.

Yes, the new standard is tighter — tight enough that polluters and other have resisted the change. But, the new standard is not tight enough.

Read more Utah Moms posts on Ozone Standards.

Press Clippings - April 7, 2008 - May 16, 2008

May 28th, 2008

‘Park City Moms Join Call To Arms For Clean Air’: A new state-wide organization sounds an un-ignorable message to legislators; appeals to Summit county’s fear of mounting Utah pollution; by Anna Bloom of The Record Staff, 04/08/2008.

‘Clean air for the kids: Davis County moms consider joining group to combat pollution’; By Brooke Adams, The Salt Lake Tribune, 04/17/2008.

‘Green parenting — Even busiest moms, dads can make eco-friendly changes in households’: By Nicole Warburton, Deseret News; Published: Tuesday, April 22, 2008.

‘A force to reckon with—Moms for Clean Air’: Written by Ardiane Andersen, Catalyst Magazine.

‘Don’t be deceived, there’s no such thing as ‘clean coal”: Cherise Udell; Article Last Updated: 05/03/2008.

‘Utahns glean tips on living greener, leaner’: By Aaron Falk, Deseret News, Published: Sunday, May 11, 2008.

‘Moms want more air testing’. County shut down monitors that were borrowed from the state. Patrick Parkinson, Of the Record staff 05/16/2008.

Californians exposed to high levels of fine particulates had their lives cut by an average of 10 years

May 25th, 2008

By Janet Wilson, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
May 22, 2008

As many as 24,000 deaths annually in California are linked to chronic exposure to fine particulate pollution, triple the previous official
estimate of 8,200, according to state researchers. The revised figures are based on a review of new research across the nation about the
hazards posed by microscopic particles, which sink deep into the lungs.

“Our report concludes these particles are 70% more dangerous than previously thought, based on several major studies that have occurred in
the last five years,” said Bart Croes, chief researcher for the California Air Resources Board. Croes will present his findings at a board meeting in Fresno this morning.

The studies, including one by USC tracking 23,000 people in greater Los Angeles, and another by the American Cancer Society monitoring 300,000
people across the United States, have found rates of heart attacks, strokes and other serious disease increase exponentially after exposure
to even slightly higher amounts of metal or dust. It is difficult to attribute individual deaths to particulate pollution, Croes conceded, but he said long-term studies that account for smoking, obesity and other risks have increasingly zeroed in on fine particulate pollution as a killer.

“There’s no death certificate that says specifically someone died of air pollution, but cities with higher rates of air pollution have much
greater rates of death from cardiovascular diseases,” he said.

Californians exposed to high levels of fine particulates had their lives cut short on average by 10 years, the board staff found. Researchers
also found that when particulates are cut even temporarily, death rates fall. “When Dublin imposed a coal ban, when Hong Kong imposed reductions
in sulfur dioxide, when there was a steel mill strike in Utah . . . they saw immediate reductions in deaths,” Croes said.

More measures will be needed, air board officials said, including eventually lowering the maximum permissible levels of soot statewide.
California already has the lowest thresholds in the world, at 12 micrograms per cubic meter, but researchers say no safe level of exposure has been found. More regulations are being drafted, including one requiring cleaner heavy-duty trucks.

“We must work even harder to cut short these life-shortening emissions,” Air Resources Board Chairwoman Mary Nichols said in a statement.

Clean air advocates said they would be watching closely.

“These numbers are shocking; they’re incredible,” said Tim Carmichael, senior policy director for the Coalition for Clean Air, a statewide
group. He and others said the board must strengthen a soot clean-up plan submitted to them by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control
District. A hearing and vote on the plan is scheduled for today.

Numerous Central Valley public health groups wrote Nichols this week, urging bans on the use of industrial equipment on bad air days, tougher
controls on boilers and crop drying equipment, and other action. The economic cost attributed to premature deaths and illnesses linked to
particulate exposure in the Central Valley has been estimated at $3 billion a year, and $70 billion statewide, according to separate studies. Those figure are expected to be revised upward based on the new report.

For more information:
Deborah Shprentz
Consultant to the American Lung Association
703-437-0959
dshprentz@hers.com
www.cleanairstandards.org

Air Pollution in the Utah Valleys: UofU Seminar May 22

May 20th, 2008

Dept of Mechanical Engineering
University of Utah
Seminar Series:
1:30-3:30 PM, Thursday May 22, 2008
1250 Warnock Eng. Building
University of Utah Campus

Air Pollution in the Utah Valleys:
Causes, Effects and Solutions

Professor Delbert Eatough
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, BYU

John Veranth
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, UofU

Robert Sawyer
Department of Mechanical Engineering, UC, Berkeley

The air quality in populated valleys in Utah ranks
among the worst in the country. The financial and
human costs of that pollution are enormous. This
seminar is an exploration the causes, effects and
solutions to this problem with a focus on recent
scientific and engineering understanding. The goal is
to inform university researchers, community health
professionals, community activists and governmental
representatives about the challenges and priorities of
work to be done to improve the air quality in the
State.

The seminar will consist of four parts. The first is a
presentation by Delbert Eatough. Professor Eatough
will discuss the chemistry of anthropogenic pollution,
particularly fine particles and aerosols. He will
present result of his studies and others related to
formation of the most toxic forms of pollution and
provide some insight into ways that public health
might be protected.

The second presentation will be by John Veranth.
Professor Veranth will discuss transport of fine
particles in the atmosphere and biological responses
to transition metals found in inorganic, air borne
particles. Professor Veranth will then discuss options
for reducing the toxicity of the more problematic
compounds found in fine particles.

The third presentation will be given by Robert Sawyer.
Professor Sawyer will discuss solutions to air
pollution that have been implemented in California and
the relevance of those approaches to the local
problems in Utah .

Following the presentations, the three speakers will
form a panel to discuss priority actions that might be
taken to improve the quality of our air.

For more information contact Prof. Kent Udell: 585-0369

Don’t be deceived, there is no such thing as ‘clean coal’

May 14th, 2008

Op-ed by Cherise Udell
Salt Lake Tribune May 3, 2008

Let’s be real: “clean coal” is a marketing slogan not a technological reality. Coal does currently provide us with a reliable source of electricity but at an astronomical price that is hidden from us consumers. Maybe you pay for it with your child’s asthma. Maybe you paid for it with your father’s heart attack or your grandmother’s stroke that took her speech away. Maybe you lost a baby to SIDS on a particularly bad air day.

Emissions from coal fired-power plants are a leading cause of smog, acid rain, global warming, air toxins – and premature deaths. The EPA estimates that over 30,000 Americans are dying prematurely each year due to power plant emissions - the majority of which are coal-powered. This doesn’t even address the high mortality rates associated with the mining process. Thus, coal kills more people annually than homicides (16,000 in 2000) or AIDS (14,000) and nearly as many as traffic accidents (42,000).

So when coal industry advocates like Joe Lucas (vice-president of communications for the American Coalition for Clean Coal) and Bountiful resident, Bruce Taylor (co-owner of the proposed coal plant in Sevier County) say “cleaner coal” what exactly do they mean? According the Union of Concerned Scientists a typical coal plant generates:

• 3,700,000 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary human cause of global warming

• 10,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2)

• 500 tons of small airborne particles, which can cause chronic bronchitis, aggravated asthma, and premature death

• 10,200 tons of nitrogen oxide (NOx), equal to what would be emitted by half a million late-model cars. NOx leads to formation of ozone (smog) which inflames the lungs and

• 720 tons of carbon monoxide (CO), which causes headaches and place additional stress on people with heart disease.

• 220 tons of hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOC), which form ozone.

• 170 pounds of mercury, an extremely potent neurotoxin, where just 1/70th of a teaspoon deposited on a 25-acre lake can make the fish unsafe for human consumption. The Great Salt Lake is already heavily contaminated with mercury.

• 225 pounds of arsenic, which will cause cancer in one out of 100 people who regularly drink water containing 50 parts per billion.

• 114 pounds of lead, 4 pounds of cadmium, other toxic heavy metals, and trace amounts of uranium.

(more…)

Even Flowers are Harmed by Air Pollution

May 12th, 2008

It isn’t all in your imagination, flowers really don’t smell as sweet anymore (at least over long distances). A recent study has found that the scent of flowers is reduced by air pollution. This reduction in the odor of flowers may even be partially responsible for the shocking collapse of bee colonies.

“The scent molecules produced by flowers in a less polluted environment, such as in the 1800s, could travel for roughly 1,000 to 1,200 meters [3,300 to 4,000 feet]; but in today’s polluted environment downwind of major cities, they may travel only 200 to 300 meters [650 to 980 feet],” said study team member Jose D. Fuentes. “[A]ir pollution destroys the aroma of flowers, by as much as 90 percent from periods before automobiles and heavy industry,” Fuentes said. “And the more air pollution there is in a region, the greater the destruction of the flower scents.”

Read more about it here and here.

Autism near coal plants

May 12th, 2008

A new study shows early indications that proximity to mercury release from a coal power plant is a predictor of autism prevalence.

It looks like closer to coal = more autism.

A newly published study of Texas school district data and industrial mercury-release data, conducted by researchers at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, indeed shows a statistically significant link between pounds of industrial release of mercury and increased autism rates. It also shows—for the first time in scientific literature—a statistically significant association between autism risk and distance from the mercury source.

This is not a definitive study but adds to other research on the effects of mercury, particularly on children.

The new study findings are consistent with a host of other studies that confirm higher amounts of mercury in plants, animals and humans the closer they are to the pollution source. The price on children may be the highest.

Read on:

Next Page »

 


Become a Member and Receive Email Alerts

 

Recent Posts

Meta